To use these platforms to create non-trivial apps, you still need to think in terms of abstraction and exercise all the same basic skills of software engineering.Many of these platforms offer visual building blocks that look easy to use, but it's still a Turing-complete system under the hood.Even if you're not literally writing lines of text into an IDE, the hard parts of coding are still present when using a low-code/no-code platform: But no-code app creation is still software development. This tradeoff seems great when you first start using these platforms to build simple apps. The underlying representation of the apps you build is typically a proprietary domain-specific language. They control the entire end-to-end development experience in order to achieve the above goals. Accessibility: non-developers can use no-code platforms to write software, expanding the set of possible app creators.Įvery no-code platform is a closed platform.Speed: you can build things faster using a no-code platform than writing code.
No-code's fatal flaw: opaque, closed systemsĪll low-code/no-code platforms have two fundamental value propositions: The ultimate death knell for no-code is finally here: AI-driven software development. However, low-code/no-code platforms don't have a long-term future.
Products like Retool, Appsmith, Bubble, and hundreds of others allow people to create software much faster than purely writing code. Over the past decade, there has been an explosion in low-code/no-code platforms.
0 kommentar(er)
